New ideaConsumer
Context Passport
A private, portable 'passport' of your AI context (memory, projects, preferences, chat history) that you can import into ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini in one click, so switching models never costs you your history.
Summary
BriefingVerified
Clauday's Oct 20 Ideas Radar flags the sharpest ask in the window: a personal operating system that keeps projects, commitments and context outside any model vendor, plus a 'switching cost no pricing page lists'. Millions of people now have years of chat history inside one vendor.…
Read the rest
Idea: a local-first vault that exports, cleans and re-imports context to any assistant, with a free tier and a $5/month sync. This is the weakest-verified idea today: vendor-native memory import tools and memory startups may already cover it, which one search did not settle. Included as honest, low-confidence.
Description
Product: browser extension + web app. Import your history/memory from one assistant (user-initiated data export files), summarise into a structured, editable profile (people, projects, preferences, style), keep it local or end-to-end encrypted on request, and re-inject it into any assistant with one click (copyable system prompt or custom-instructions file).…
Read the rest
Free: one export/import; Paid ($5/month): continuous sync, multiple profiles (work/personal), diff view of what changed. Faceless growth: SEO/GEO ('export ChatGPT memory to Claude'), templates, AI-persona explainers, shareable 'my AI profile' cards. Global Application: every language/assistant. LatAm Version: PT-BR/ES onboarding, Pix/card web checkout, Brazil/Mexico power users of ChatGPT. Key unknown: vendor import tools and ToS for data export use; privacy handling needs care (no security-posture claims).
Target customer
Prosumers in Brazil, LatAm and global markets who use more than one AI assistant
Pain
Switching assistants resets accumulated context
Why this score
Why it scored lower: Gap may already be closed by vendors
MoatHypothesis
Neutrality + format library. Vendor-neutral position and maintained import/export adapters. Vendors can ship native import; weak moat. Status: Hypothesis.
Demand signals
X posts (7 days)
n/a
Signal trend
n/a
Web demand
Ideas Radar Oct 20 2026 (community-reported); no quantified demand yet.
Market and competitors
TAMHypothesisEstimate
$3B (Hypothesis) — Global prosumer AI-assistant tooling spend. Method: Hypothesis; not sourced. Sources: Hark estimate (Hypothesis).
SAMHypothesisEstimate
$90M (Hypothesis) — Multi-assistant power users in EN/PT/ES. Method: Hypothesis: ~15M users x ~3% paying x ~$60/year ≈ $27M near term; $90M ceiling. Sources: Hark estimate (Hypothesis).
SOMHypothesisEstimate
$60K ARR (Hypothesis) — 12 months. Method: ~1,000 payers x ~$60/year. Low confidence. Sources: Hark estimate (Hypothesis).
Competitors
Vendor-native memory/import features, memory startups, notes apps with AI
Business model
Monetization
Freemium; $5/month sync and profiles
Revenue hypothesis (monthly)Hypothesis
Base ~$2K/month, conservative ~$300/month at 12 months (Hypothesis).
Jobs to be done
When every time I try a different AI I lose what it knows about me, I want to carry my context across assistants with one click, so I can work with the best model without starting over.
HXC
André · 33 · São Paulo: Product manager who uses ChatGPT and Claude daily and keeps re-explaining himself. Frustration & buying signal: Frustrated that switching tools resets his context; would pay monthly to keep it portable.
Build and go-to-market
Tech stack
Cursor + Vercel + GitHub cesarx2 (one repo); Supabase; Stripe
GTM channels
SEO/GEO 'export X to Y' pages, templates, shareable profile cards; no founder face, no paid ads
Risks
Main risk
Gap may already be closed by vendors
All risks
Value Risk: Attention — May already be solved natively. Next: 1-day landscape check. | Usability Risk: Attention — Export steps differ per vendor. Next: Guided flows per vendor. | Feasibility Risk: Supported — Simple parsing and prompt injection. Next: None critical. | Viability Risk: Elevated — Vendor ToS and privacy handling. Next: Local-first design; legal review.
Next validation step
1-day landscape check of native import and memory startups
Sources
ai-memory, portability, prosumer, extension, subscription, b2c, idea, new, below-bar
Want the next one the day it is scored?
The score, the sources, the risks and the next step, by email.
Related ideas
Ton-piston-style copycat for Brazil and Mexico
Ton-piston sells a monthly Pro plan to French students for an internship/apprenticeship search engine with AI CV, cover-letter and fit tools; TrustMRR (Stripe-verified) shows $9,639 MRR and $22,474 all-time revenue about 11 weeks after its 2026-08-03 founding.
65/100
Why it scored lower: Free substitutes and unmeasured clones
Open ProductBots.ai →PhotoCraft-powered seller photo studio
storytold/photocraft, an open-source clean-room Photoshop alternative in Rust, has 70,930 stars and 12,508 forks 22 days after creation (about 3.2K stars a day, Hypothesis for the 7-day pace); HBV builds the no-learning-curve layer: batch product-photo cleanup for marketplace sellers.
64/100
Why it scored lower: Maintainers ship the layer; alpha quality
Open ProductBots.ai →Daycare Price Index
Real daycare prices and openings by ZIP code and county, with alerts — starting in the US.
63/100
Why it scored lower: Crowdsourced cold start, price accuracy, weak X fit, local/sensitive/politicized topic.
Open ProductBots.ai →
Research, not investment advice. Numbers keep the label they were published with.