New ideaConsumer media
Streaming Ad Minutes Index
A crowd-timed index of how many minutes of ads each streaming ad tier (Netflix, Prime Video, Disney+, Max, Globoplay, YouTube) actually shows per hour, by country and by show — so people know what the "cheaper" plan really costs in time.
Working title: Streaming Ad Minutes Index (working name)
Summary
BriefingHypothesis
New idea. Existence check: Searches on 21 Oct 2026 found one-off press and academic studies (TechRadar, DigitalFernsehen, a Spanish academic comparison, an industry blog) and a data vendor tracking tier availability (Actowiz) — but no ongoing, public, country-by-country ad-minutes tracker.…
Read the rest
X: 264 posts/7d (Down 11% Thu→Tue (full UTC days: Thu 15 44 → Tue 20 39); peak Thu 15 44; Tue 20 is 11% below peak; window 2026-10-14 10:00 UTC → 2026-10-21 10:00 UTC (Wed 14 Oct and Wed 21 Oct are partial UTC days; full days Thu 15 → Tue 20)). Revenue hypothesis: ~$1K–$5K/month at month 9 (HYPOTHESIS: sponsor slots + affiliate sign-ups + small paid reports).
DescriptionHypothesis
A crowd-timed index of how many minutes of ads each streaming ad tier (Netflix, Prime Video, Disney+, Max, Globoplay, YouTube) actually shows per hour, by country and by show — so people know what the "cheaper" plan really costs in time. Who: Streaming subscribers deciding between ad tiers and ad-free plans, globally; Brazil and Mexico first in PT/ES.…
Read the rest
Pain: Services publish prices, not ad loads; ad minutes differ by country and change quietly. Viewers only find out by watching, and the few numbers in the press are one-off studies. Monetization: Free index; labeled sponsor slots (ad-free devices, VPN-free legal bundles, streaming comparison partners) priced with traffic; affiliate links to plan sign-ups where programs exist; paid monthly data report for journalists (hypothesis). Build: 1–2 agent-weeks (mobile web ad timer, submission + outlier filter, per-country pages, share cards); stack: Next.js PWA on Vercel; Postgres; outlier filtering; edge OG cards. GTM: Share cards ("<service> showed me N minutes of ads in 1 hour"); SEO/GEO per service+country; monthly faceless "ad load report" posts that press can cite.
Target customer
Streaming subscribers deciding between ad tiers and ad-free plans, globally; Brazil and Mexico first in PT/ES.
Pain
Services publish prices, not ad loads; ad minutes differ by country and change quietly. Viewers only find out by watching, and the few numbers in the press are one-off studies.
Why this score
Why it scored lower: Cold start and noisy timings; services may change ad loads per user, making averages contested.
MoatHypothesis
Timed-hours dataset: The archive of crowd-timed hours by country and month cannot be backfilled by a late copycat. Press citations and share cards bring new timers. Status: Hypothesis.
Demand signals
X posts (7 days)
264
Signal trend
Down 11% Thu→Tue (full UTC days: Thu 15 44 → Tue 20 39); peak Thu 15 44; Tue 20 is 11% below peak
Web demandVerifiedEstimate
Streaming-ad complaints in English: 264 posts/7d, flat (Verified X). Smart-TV ad anger rose sharply this week (597/7d, Verified) — the same audience. Ad-minute figures in press are third-party estimates (not used here).
Market and competitors
TAM
Not sized this run — Scope: Streaming comparison traffic. Method: No report fetched. (Basis: n/a)
SAMHypothesis
~$12K–$60K / yr (hypothesis) — Scope: Sponsors + affiliate + reports. Method: Rev ×12. (Basis: HBV assumption)
SOMHypothesis
~$12K–$60K ARR (hypothesis) — Scope: Month-9. Method: as SAM. (Basis: Low)
Competitors
JustWatch/Reelgood (availability and price, not ad load), one-off press studies, Actowiz (B2B data). No public ad-minutes index found.
Business model
MonetizationHypothesis
Free index; labeled sponsor slots (ad-free devices, VPN-free legal bundles, streaming comparison partners) priced with traffic; affiliate links to plan sign-ups where programs exist; paid monthly data report for journalists (hypothesis).
Revenue hypothesis (monthly)Hypothesis
~$1K–$5K/month at month 9 (HYPOTHESIS: sponsor slots + affiliate sign-ups + small paid reports).
Jobs to be done
When I am choosing between an ad tier and ad-free, I want to see the real ad minutes per hour in my country, so I can decide if the discount is worth my time.
HXC
Bruno, 30, Guadalajara (illustrative) · Switched to an ad tier to save money; feels he watches more ads than shows. Buying signal: Times two episodes, shares the card, and checks the index before renewing.
Build and go-to-market
Tech stack
Next.js PWA on Vercel; Postgres; outlier filtering; edge OG cards
GTM channels
Share cards ("<service> showed me N minutes of ads in 1 hour"); SEO/GEO per service+country; monthly faceless "ad load report" posts that press can cite
Risks
Main risk
Cold start and noisy timings; services may change ad loads per user, making averages contested.
All risks
Value: Supported — Steady complaint signal | Usability: Attention — Timing effort for users | Feasibility: Supported — Simple stack | Business Viability: High — Cold start and contested averages
Next validation step
Recruit 200 timed hours across 4 services in BR+US in 14 days; kill if fewer than 100 or if share-card rate is under 5%.
Sources
- techradar.com (streaming ad-load article)
- digitalfernsehen.de (Werbe-Abo-Modelle)
- doi.org
- actowizsolutions.com
- X API counts
ideacrowdsourced-indexstreamingadsshare-cardsponsorship-slotsseogeob2cgloballatam
Want the next one the day it is scored?
The score, the sources, the risks and the next step, by email.
Related ideas
Agent Savings Index
A faceless weekly index that runs the same real-world money tasks (groceries, flights, bills, refunds) through consumer AI agents such as Meta Muse, ChatGPT and Gemini and publishes which one actually saved the most money, with a public leaderboard, newsletter and sponsor slots.
55/100
Why it scored lower: Reproducibility and vendor terms (agents change weekly; some actions need real purchases), plus perceived bias if affiliates are involved.
Open ProductBots.ai →
Research, not investment advice. Numbers keep the label they were published with.